Hi Richard.

The luck adjusted result looks OK to me.

You had -12.342% luck and tophat had +35.705% luck.
The actual result was you -50%, tophat +50%.

The Luck-Adjusted result formula = Actual Result - Own Luck + Opponent's Luck.

Your luck-adjusted result = -50 - -12.342 + 35.705 = -1.953%
Tophat's luck-adjusted result = 50 - 35.705 + -12.342 = -1.953%

In other words, without the luck, tophat would have got to 1.95% instead of 
+50%, and you would have got to -1.95% instead of -50%. His victory was almost 
entirely by luck.

You aren't the first person to find this confusing.

If the formula were instead (50 - Own Luck + Opponent's Luck), we would have 
got 98.05% and 1.95% in your favour.

May be it's the Actual Result that is the source of the confusion. If this were 
reported as +100 and 0, rather than +50 and -50, the current formula  (Result - 
Own Luck + Opponent's Luck), would give 48.05% and 51.95%. This indicates that, 
with the luck removed, your opponent only managed to get from 50% to 51.95%. 
Again, his victory was almost entirely luck.

I think that  (50 - Own Luck + Opponent's Luck) gives the most intuitive result.

Does anyone know how the other two active bots, XG and BgBlitz, report the luck 
adjusted result? It might be sensible to standardize on a definition and use 
that. I've a feeling that XG uses (50 - Own Luck + Opponent's Luck), but this 
is only based on my hazy recollection of the discussions at DailyGammon when 
Miran ran some luck-adjusted tournaments.


n  Ian

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
RICHARD BEAGLEY
Sent: 04 January 2015 16:08
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Bug-gnubg] Wrong luck adjusted result on Grandmaster analysis

Version GNU backgammon 0.90.0 Aug 8 2011

via XQuartz 2.7.7 (xoorg-server 1.15.2) on MAC OSX 10.6.8

Analysis - grandmaster 3 ply

This a single game result (3 point) with extreme differences in move, cube and 
luck ratings.  I should have had a luck adjusted win!

Is this a known bug and / or is my software out of date?

Regards

Richard Beagley (tregurtha)
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Reply via email to