> > But in no way can this alone explain such a large discrepancy. The > Ubuntu package must use some more onerous compilation options. >
I haven't looked but I suspect it likely has to do with the default compile options for packages that newer versions of Ubuntu uses. Options for Strong stack protection comes to mind. I haven't looked so it is just a guess. _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
