I want to think that comments like this in *2017* are just a troll repeating a very old meme, but is it? You cannot read revieww of a single *good* bg engine (neural net) that doesn't have these exact kinds of complaints even though it has been so thoroughly debunked over and over again. Just bizarre. I keep thinking there's some kind of paper to be written on the subject but given that bg is such a small niche community I'm guessing it won't happen.
Oh well. Still fun to read these rage-quits. On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Michael Petch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 2017-08-18 07:53, Mario Bozeglav wrote: >> >> anyone serious BG player can see the random dice generator is a myth. >> anyone who plays GNU-BG with manual dice entry can see that the results >> are VERY different than when playing with the supposedly "random" generator. >> > > Thank for the compliment and feedback. Let us know what software you > settle on that gives you the dice you deserve! good luck in your games! > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
