On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 02:09:33PM +0100, Øystein Schønning-Johansen wrote:
> So.... the conclusion must be that there is something funny with the > movefilters. Don't know what. 0-ply evaluates the resulting positions quite haphazardly and there is only one move with 24/19 if the first eight choices. The wider filter gets three more and these four get the top spots at 2-ply. This is better but there are still a few reasonable 24/19 plays missing. The 0-ply evaluations of the next roll position are probably rather poor as well since the 2-ply equities of these moves are much more dispersed than they should. 3-ply is better and 4-ply seems right, with all the plays breaking the 24 point sensibly in a 0.02 interval. _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
