How does the paper report this? Does it take gammon and backgammons into account (ie. cubeless moneygame) or does it just count win/loss ratio (ie. like one-point-match) ?
-Øystein On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:05 PM Robert Edgar <[email protected]> wrote: > Can anyone confirm the score of a recent version of gnubg vs. pubeval? I > hacked the source and found that gnubg v1.06 averaged +1.1ppg (82% wins) > over 10k games, but a recent paper Papahristou & Refanidis (2017) quotes > +0.60 ppg which is only marginally better than TD-Gammon (+0.59). My > number seems high, but +0.6 seems too low considering how much effort > went into optimizing the gnubg code. > > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg >
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
