On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 10:42:10AM +0100, Øystein Schønning-Johansen wrote: > Thanks for your effort Philippe. Your numbers looks correct. > > However, I think it is important to state some more details. > > First: Are the games played to completion? Or are the games terminated at > race or bearoff or ... > Second: Does the pubeval evaluate all the position classes? I once did the > mistake in a similar experiment where the pubeval player actually used a > full bearoff look up table. > And then: These are cubeless moneygames I assume. These are not one-point > matches. > > (Another potential bug is the opening roll. I guess that it is taken care > of.)
I didn't use gnubg + some changes, but the gnubg-nn tools from Joseph Heled, so that should be cubeless games without bearoff databases and, at least, directly comparable to gnubg's 2012 numbers. _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
