If the cube decisions are close, then playing at a higher cube value is correct 
in match play. This reduced the number of games in the match, which increases 
the worse player’s probability of winning it.

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: 23 August 2022 19:54
To: 'Øystein Schønning-Johansen' <[email protected]>; 'Joseph Heled' 
<[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Shaw <[email protected]>; 'Ezequiel Galarce' 
<[email protected]>; 'bug-gnubg' <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: GNU Backgammon

Yes!

Øystein’s logic reminds me of an anecdote from years ago. A friend took a 
double in a non-skill position that was a clear drop. The dice bailed him out, 
but he redoubled way too early. He explained, “you’re the better player so I 
have to do things with the cube.” I explained that the reason I’m a better 
player is I don’t make silly cube errors.

Best,

David

PS – he won the match, so what do I know?



From: Øystein Schønning-Johansen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 11:29 AM
To: Joseph Heled <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Ian Shaw <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Ezequiel Galarce 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; bug-gnubg 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: GNU Backgammon

Yes!

I am also very skeptical of the effect of skewed match equity tables. Why 
should this work?
If the best player is better he has a higher probability of winning, so his/her 
doubling point is appearing earlier.

However in a position type where skill is not really dominant, say no contact 
position, the doubling from the strongest player should rather be delayed to 
avoid the underdog being lucky.

I strongly believe that cube handling in matches of uneven players should 
rather consider the skill needed to play the specific position on the board. 
Just making a skewed MET is in my opinion not the solution.

As a serious besserwisser, I am (in this case) not willing to make any effort 
to do any type of experiments to prove me right. (I'm just using the same logic 
as flat-earthers and ani-vaxxers etc.) :-)

-Øystein

tir. 23. aug. 2022 kl. 19:56 skrev Joseph Heled 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:

A personal note, if I may.

Back in the day I dabbled with rating adjusted equity tables, i.e. having the 
stronger player use an adjusted equity table based on the rating difference.

I was never able to make it work. If anything, it ended up with the higher 
rated "player" doing worse. It's possible I implemented it wrong, but I would 
like to see some evidence first ...

Also, using different equity tables rarely makes a difference in actual play. 
Again I struggled to prove that one equity table is much better in practice 
than others.
With todays computing power it should be much easier to set up experiments. 
Anyone up to the task?

(Ian might remember how I distributed the rollouts for the net training. I 
could not have done it without you or the others!!!)

-Joseph


On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 05:12, Ian Shaw 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thanks David.

That T-12 is very interesting. I see that the subsequent tables are based on an 
increasing cubeless win % by 1% per 50 rating points.

The Elo formula gives a higher win rate for a given rating (in a 1-point match) 
than the equivalent Jacobs Table.

Table #

Page

Rating point difference

Jacobs Table cpw

Elo cpw

T-13

32

0 (even)

50.0

50.0

T-15

34

100

52.0

52.9

T-17

36

200

54.0

55.7

T-19

38

300

56.0

58.6


I’ll try to construct the xml files for the tables over the next few days.

-- Ian



From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: 23 August 2022 17:33
To: Ian Shaw <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
'Øystein Schønning-Johansen' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
'Ezequiel Galarce' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 'bug-gnubg' 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: GNU Backgammon

Ian et al,

I also included T-12 which gives the parameters for subsequent tables. Let me 
know if you want more.

I’m also not sure how happy the list-serv is with 5MB of attachments. I can 
find other ways to send them if need be.

Best,

David

From: Ian Shaw <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 12:59 AM
To: public@booksongamingcom<mailto:[email protected]>; 'Øystein 
Schønning-Johansen' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 'Ezequiel 
Galarce' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 'bug-gnubg' 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: GNU Backgammon

Hi David,

From 
https://bkgm.com/articles/Sengoku/GraphicalMatchEquity/FishEffects/index.html I 
understand that these are the tables used for compiling the METs.

Since we have a jac50, I assume that one would be T-14.
If you could send a picture of T-17 and T-19, that would be great.

Table #

Page

Rating point difference

T-13

32

0 (even)

T-15

34

100

T-17

36

200

T-19

38

300


Thanks,
Ian Shaw


From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: 23 August 2022 00:29
To: Ian Shaw <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
'Øystein Schønning-Johansen' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
'Ezequiel Galarce' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 'bug-gnubg' 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: GNU Backgammon

I have a copy of the book. There are more than 60 tables in it, but if anyone 
knows which one(s) you’re looking for, I’m happy to send along photos.

Best,

David Levy

From: Bug-gnubg 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 On Behalf Of Ian Shaw
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 1:34 PM
To: Øystein Schønning-Johansen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
Ezequiel Galarce <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; bug-gnubg 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: GNU Backgammon

There was a table in the book. Tom Keith refers to it in one of his articles on 
bkgm.com<http://bkgm.com>.

If I can resurrect an old hard drive, I'll have a look.

It ought to be possible to generate fish tables from first principles, assuming 
a win rate and gammon rate per player.

I think Jacobs used 24% gammon rate, which is higher than most.


Regards,

Ian Shaw


________________________________
From: Bug-gnubg 
<bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=riverauto.co.uk@gnuorg<mailto:[email protected]>>
 on behalf of Øystein Schønning-Johansen 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 5:08:30 PM
To: Ezequiel Galarce <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; bug-gnubg 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: GNU Backgammon

Hmmm....

If my archive remembers correctly there never was a jac200 table. I don't have 
a copy of "Can a Fish Taste Twice as Good?", is it even a table in that book? I 
find no file called jac200.xml in the CVS attic either. So if there was a file 
called jac200,xml it must have been a local contribution that never was checked 
in.

The guy who contributed this was named Craig Campbell. (Must be 20 years ago or 
so) Is it possible to get hold of him?

-Øystein

man. 22. aug. 2022 kl. 17:27 skrev Ezequiel Galarce 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:
I don't know, I'm asking the creator of the equity table, maybe he has it

El lun., 22 ago. 2022 16:06, Ian Shaw 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> escribió:

H Ezequiel,



Now that you mention it, I think you’re right. I wonder why it’s been omitted 
from the installation.



Does anyone here have a copy of the jac200 MET?



-- Ian



From: Ezequiel Galarce <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: 22 August 2022 15:01
To: Ian Shaw <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: GNU Backgammon



Hello, I have contacted the creator of "jac050" and "jac100" and he told me 
that he thinks he remembers that he had made a "jac200", I don't have any data.



El lun., 22 ago. 2022 12:51, Ian Shaw 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> escribió:

Hi Ezequiel,



I don’t think the jac200 table is available on line.



If you have the raw data, it’s easy to make a MET that gnubg can use. I could 
create one if you can find the data



Regards,

Ian





From: Ezequiel Galarce <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: 19 August 2022 22:19
To: Ian Shaw <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: GNU Backgammon



Hello good evening, can you get the equity table "jac200.xml"?



El vie., 19 ago. 2022 14:54, Ian Shaw 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> escribió:

Reply via email to