man. 2. juni 2025 kl. 21:57 skrev MK <[email protected]>: > Back to your question: has there ever been an article > about gamblegammon that was peer-reviewed? >
I cannot remember that I asked that question. Unless the question you state is rhetorical as no article of backgammon has ever been peer-reviewed. But that is wrong - lot's of articles on backgammon have been peer reviewed. All articles by Tesauro among others. Hans Berliner's articles. M Boro's race article, Art Benjamin/A Ross articles to mention a few. > For example, was any of the dozens, if not hundreds, of > articles posted on "Backgammon Galore", etc. by them BS > degreed scientists, mythematicians, et. al. (which were > used as reference material in the gamblegammon circles > for so many decades)...? > You should always question the reliability of whatever you read (especially these days). It is therefore important to evaluate the trustworthiness of any source. However - some things are for certain: The earth is not flat whatever the flat earthers say! The development of vaccines is one of the greatest achievements in the history of science! The moonlanding was not fake. Evolution is a fact! ... and so on ... > Why should you be more demanding of Tilemachos Zoidis? > > Or of me...? :) > I don't demand anything more from Tilemachos (nor you). If what he writes makes sense, and I see no flaws, he might be right. Even probably right. -Øystein
