Derek Price wrote: >This was about what I was thinking, though I was going to combine >canon_host & canon_host_r in the canon-host module and let the caller >decide what to call. How about this API: > >
Hrm. Why isn't canon-host dependant on getaddrinfo? It would simplify the canon-host code so much that it would probably be all right to LGPL it. It would also mean that canon-host could just return error codes suitable for gai_strerror. I'll have to extend lib/getaddrinfo.c a little to fill in ai_canonhost and add the gai_strerror function. Would that be acceptable? Come to think of it, after that, canon-host would be a pretty thin wrapper around getaddrinfo. Perhaps it would be best to tweak getaddrinfo and drop the canon-host module entirely? Regards, Derek -- Derek R. Price CVS Solutions Architect Ximbiot <http://ximbiot.com> v: +1 717.579.6168 f: +1 717.234.3125 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
