Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hrm. Why isn't canon-host dependant on getaddrinfo? It would simplify > the canon-host code so much that it would probably be all right to LGPL > it. It would also mean that canon-host could just return error codes > suitable for gai_strerror. I'll have to extend lib/getaddrinfo.c a > little to fill in ai_canonhost and add the gai_strerror function. Would > that be acceptable?
Good idea. More than `acceptable' :-) > Come to think of it, after that, canon-host would be a pretty thin > wrapper around getaddrinfo. Perhaps it would be best to tweak > getaddrinfo and drop the canon-host module entirely? I'd like to keep canon-host. Otherwise, callers would have to deal with all of the header requirements that are currently nicely encapsulated. _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
