Jim Meyering wrote:
> > I've worked on it and it's OK with me to relicense to LGPLv2, which is
> > what glibc needs.
>
>
> It's fine to relicense my parts to LGPLv2.
Thanks, Paul and Jim. With this, we can change the license of the modules
'dev-ino' and 'cycle-check' (done below).
For module 'fts', in particular lib/fts.c, we also need the agreements of
- myself, for commit 6edf6dbacf1e136539da03115adee858ec8a3d33,
- Pádraig Brady, for commits
49078a780041205fbbab56802033595eb44f854d
6835fc458f30b94f15d69c35a79cbc2dfabe2d06,
- Kamil Dudka, for commit
ac67780e88411e8fcb94cda0a9e0a9abab6f8369.
Other commits are below the "not copyrightable" threshold.
I hereby give my permission to relicense my contributions to this file
under LGPLv2+.
What about you, Pádraig and Kamil?
Bruno
2026-02-19 Bruno Haible <[email protected]>
cycle-check: Relicense under LGPLv2+.
Jim Meyering's permission is at
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2026-02/msg00109.html>.
Paul Eggert's permission is at
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2026-02/msg00106.html>.
* modules/cycle-check (License): Change to LGPLv2+.
* lib/cycle-check.h: Update license notice.
* lib/cycle-check.c: Likewise.
dev-ino: Relicense under LGPLv2+.
Jim Meyering's permission is at
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2026-02/msg00109.html>.
* modules/dev-ino (License): Change to LGPLv2+.
* lib/dev-ino.h: Update license notice.
