On 19/02/2026 14:16, Bruno Haible wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
I've worked on it and it's OK with me to relicense to LGPLv2, which is
what glibc needs.


It's fine to relicense my parts to LGPLv2.

Thanks, Paul and Jim. With this, we can change the license of the modules
'dev-ino' and 'cycle-check' (done below).

For module 'fts', in particular lib/fts.c, we also need the agreements of
   - myself, for commit 6edf6dbacf1e136539da03115adee858ec8a3d33,
   - Pádraig Brady, for commits
     49078a780041205fbbab56802033595eb44f854d
     6835fc458f30b94f15d69c35a79cbc2dfabe2d06,
   - Kamil Dudka, for commit
     ac67780e88411e8fcb94cda0a9e0a9abab6f8369.
Other commits are below the "not copyrightable" threshold.

I hereby give my permission to relicense my contributions to this file
under LGPLv2+.

What about you, Pádraig and Kamil?

I hereby give my permission to relicense my contributions to this file
under LGPLv2+.

thanks,
Padraig

Reply via email to