On Thursday, June 27, 2002, at 07:01 PM, Chris B. Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 16:24:25 +0100 (BST) > Nicola Pero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] >> It's a bit sad, but maybe this is the best solution in practice - I >> received a couple of private emails with precisely this suggestion - >> that >> on Solaris trying to use /bin/sh is going to cause headaches forever >> and >> that everyone using Solaris is actually using a POSIX shell instead >> (such >> as zsh - which if I understood currectly is shipped with solaris >> too -, or >> bash). > > Both, actually, if not quite up-to-date... (haven't tested Sol9 yet) Same here (Sol 8). >> Objections anyone ? Is such an approach going to make someone unhappy ? > > Certainly not me. Nope. But what exactly would you replace #!/bin/sh in the GNUstep scripts with? A current FreeBSD still ships with: znek@muller:(~)$ uname -sr FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE znek@muller:(~)$ l /bin/*sh -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 641232 Jun 16 17:54 /bin/csh -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 454488 Jun 16 17:54 /bin/sh -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 641232 Jun 16 17:54 /bin/tcsh Cheers, Marcus -- Marcus Mueller . . . crack-admin/coder ;-) Mulle kybernetiK . http://www.mulle-kybernetik.com Current projects: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
