On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 19:25:28 +0200 Marcus M�ller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Both, actually, if not quite up-to-date... (haven't tested Sol9 yet) > Same here (Sol 8).
That's what I'm using ;-) > >> Objections anyone ? Is such an approach going to make someone unhappy ? > > Certainly not me. > Nope. But what exactly would you replace #!/bin/sh in the GNUstep > scripts with? A current FreeBSD still ships with: No need, if you use zsh. Using 'emulate csh' you could use zsh to, well, emulate csh behaviour (see 'man zshall'). I don't think it's possible to write one script that can be interpreted by every shell variant, but since /bin/sh exist on every system... The problem would be to find a common denominator, since some systems link /bin/sh to /bin/bash, others to /bin/csh or /bin/ksh. Come to think of, osh(1) probably is the 'purest' shell, implementing just the standard commands of UNIX up to edition 7. See http://omnibus.ruf.uni-freiburg.de/~gritter/man/osh.html -- Chris _______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
