On Sep 16, 2004, at 2:06 AM, Jeremy Tregunna wrote:
Good morning;
I've recently written a patch against NSHost to make it IPv6 aware, and am curious to hear some of your thoughts about it.
I've tried to keep from adding any new methods (though I did add one to the "Private" category as you can see in the patch); and verified no breakage here with IPv4 addressing, and IPv6 addressing appears to be working fine (again here, using KAME version 20010528/FreeBSD).
I haven't looked at the patch, but it would help to get this in faster, if you could sign a disclaimer or assign copyright to the FSF (all code for GNUstep must be assigned to the FSF so that it is easier to handle possible copyright problems). Here's the form:
request-assign.future
Description: Binary data
Let me know if you have questions._______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
