I think I remember looking at it and it looked OK. But I think I wanted
someone like Richard to look at it. Jeremy has an assignment on file,
so it is OK to put in from that standpoint.
On May 21, 2005, at 12:55 AM, Alex Perez wrote:
Did this patch ever get reviewed/applied?
Jeremy Tregunna wrote:
Good morning;
I've recently written a patch against NSHost to make it IPv6 aware,
and am curious to hear some of your thoughts about it.
I've tried to keep from adding any new methods (though I did add one
to the "Private" category as you can see in the patch); and verified
no breakage here with IPv4 addressing, and IPv6 addressing appears to
be working fine (again here, using KAME version 20010528/FreeBSD).
Any suggestions, critisims are welcome.
Thanks.
-Jeremy Tregunna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
