Follow-up Comment #3, bug #19451 (project gnustep):
I think a subclass which subverts normal array semantics to such an extent
that this does not work would probably be unusable for most purposes. The
code depends upon the order of objects in an array remaining the same after
removal of an element, and anything that doesn't do that really doesn't
deserve to be called an array.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?19451>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
