Follow-up Comment #4, bug #19451 (project gnustep):
Ah ... just realised ... when you said 'iterating' you perhaps referred to
the original patch using an enumerator and assumed that the implementation I
did used a reverse enumerator. In fact I used -count and -objectAtIndex:
The point about using NSEnumerator and modifying the collection being
enumerated is generally valid, but does not apply in this case.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?19451>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
