Hey Fred,

I forgot reply to "[email protected]" as well and therefore don't know
whether you didn't got the mail weren't able to respond yet. I'm sending it
again just in case:

Seems like I'm the only one using it for the last 7 years, otherwise it
would have been found already, wouldn't it :D.

Unfortunately we are not getting away that easy. The following changes were
necessary to get it building again:

- sed -i 's/flite_cmu_us_kal/flite_cmu_us_kal16/g' Tools/speech/GNUmakefile
- sed -i 's/register_cmu_us_kal/register_cmu_us_kal16/g' Tools/speech/
FliteSpeechEngine.m

I'm however wondering if it is necessary to detect which library is
installed. The 1.4 version (at least the one I'm using) also contains
the "flite_cmu_us_kal16"
library and therefore the build works fine with these changes as well. Even
so I don't now if that's true in general.

As a side note. The gnustep packages libs-base [1], libs-back [2]
and libs-gui [3] are offering a signature. The one for libs-base however is
the only one that worked for me failing the others with:

gpg: Signature made Tue 02 Jan 2018 12:00:14 AM CET
gpg:                using DSA key CA868D4C99149679
gpg: BAD signature from "GNUstep Maintainer <[email protected]>"
[unknown]

[1] https://github.com/gnustep/libs-base/releases
[2] https://github.com/gnustep/libs-back/releases
[3] https://github.com/gnustep/libs-gui/releases

Best
Marc

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Fred Kiefer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Marc,
>
> the simplest thing to test now would be to change the line in the
> GNUmakefile in the Tools/speech subdirectory to link to the new name
> instead of the old. If that works, we have to figure out why this changed
> and how to detect which of the libraries is present.
>
> I just found this bit of configuration code: https://lists.freebsoft.org/
> pipermail/speechd/2010q3/002340.html
> Looks like this was changed a long time ago :-(
>
> Fred
>
>
> > Am 26.01.2018 um 08:42 schrieb Mettke, Marc <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Hey Fred,
> >
> > thanks for the quick response.
> >
> > OS: archlinux
> > flite 2.1: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/flite/
> > flite 2.1 files:
> > - usr/include/flite/flite.h
> > - usr/include/flite/flite_version.h
> > filte installation: pacman -S flite
> > libgui build: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=
> gnustep-gui
> >
> > Interesting enough both packages do install flite in the same directory
> with the same name. However flite 2.1 does not contain "flite_cmu_us_kal"
> but only "flite_cmu_us_kal16".
> >
> > Best
> > Marc
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 8:23 AM, Fred Kiefer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Marc,
> >
> > I never did use flite myself, so I had to check the internet whether
> there was a change in packaging. But I did not find anything that suggests
> this. At least the documentation at http://www.festvox.org/flite/
> doc/flite_7.html#C-example still suggests to link against this file.
> Could you please check which lib files did get installed for flite 2.1?
> >
> > For us it would be helpful to get a few more basic informations from
> you. Which operation system are you using and how did you install flite?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Fred
> >
> >
> > > Am 26.01.2018 um 06:42 schrieb Mettke, Marc <[email protected]>:
> > >
> > > Dear GnuStep-Team,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to build the libs-gui code in version "gui-0_26_2" from [1]
> using flite 2.1. The presence of flite is detected at [2] but the build
> fails with [3]. The build however works if I'm using flite 1.4.
> > >
> > > Is flite in version 2 supported or is it required to use flite version
> 1?
> > >
> > > Best Regards
> > > Marc Mettke
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/gnustep/libs-gui/releases
> > > [2]
> > > checking flite/flite.h usability... yes
> > > checking flite/flite.h presence... yes
> > > checking for flite/flite.h... yes
> > > [3] /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lflite_cmu_us_kal
> > > [4] https://app.box.com/s/c8u2wll61ww2z2guf3n7pu0qiqjciuc2
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bug-gnustep mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
> >
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep

Reply via email to