--- Em qua, 6/6/12, Loic J. Duros escreveu: > De: Loic J. Duros > Assunto: Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] IceCat 12.0: /bin/bash: src/.deps/.dirstamp: > Permission denied > Para: [email protected] > Data: Quarta-feira, 6 de Junho de 2012, 8:46 > On 06/06/2012 04:33 AM, alexus / > dotcommon wrote: > > Il 06.06.2012 01:39 Loic J. Duros ha scritto: > > > >> On 06/05/2012 06:59 PM, al3xu5 / dotcommon wrote: > >>> Loic, maybe there is something 'strange' in the > compressed release file > >>> (icecat-12.0.tar.xz): once decompressed, > folders have SGID set... Is it ok? > >>> > >> Did you try to run it as './configure && > make' instead of 'sudo > >> ./configure && make'? > > > > Hi > > > > I run it as './configure && make', without > 'sudo'. The same when run 'install'. > > > > I have already compiled some previous version of IceCat > (9 and 10) in this way, > > with no errors in the past [1]. > I haven't tried running install without sudo. I'll try that. > One issue that I found is that build/unix/run-icecat.sh > didn't have the execute bit on. This initially prevented > running sudo make install. In any case, I'll release an > updated version and place it in the "alpha" ftp first so > that you can test it. It would be great if you could help > troubleshoot the new version! :-)
On 04-06-2012 14:31, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > I believe the problem comes from running ./configure with sudo (as root), > as any new file/directory created will be owned by root. Then, you run > make as > normal user and have no privileges to deal with the new files/directories. Just to thank alexus for agreeing with my previous post on 04-06-2012 about running configure and make as normal use. But if sudo ./configure && sudo make is used should also work, although in my previous mail I discuss that it is not recommended. Notice that: ( sudo ./configure && sudo make ) is not the same as ( sudo ./configure && make ). -- []s, Fernando -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
