Hi, On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 18:50:14 +0100 (BST) <[email protected]> wrote:
> sounds really nice, but why would we want to pass along such strongly > minimalistic > "un-de-freedomed" browsers along to the normal people specifically without > added security features? this basically lands them back right where they > started since they are immediately washed clean and then re-exposed to the > filth of the world again. we have to help them but "here don't go alone, take > this!" without security- without defense there is nothing worth defending. I don't quite understand. A libre web browser does give people a browser which does not download proprietary plugins without asking nor suggest to install non-free Addons. Privacy aware search engines are enabled by default. Why would this lead people back "to the filth"? Users of free software are not stupid. I strongly believe that people must be offered complete free/libre software. But we don't have to lecture them like children what the can and can't do. This attitude will provoke contradiction. We can suggest and recommend - but the choice should be freely made by the user. Regards, Henry -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
