I see "ublock origin" has a built-in rule available for "no-remote-fonts". Does anybody know how to add a simple rule for "no remote anything"?
Thanks. El 27/09/16 a les 01:28, mdn ha escrit: > Icecat is already limited by the number of volunteers, I would like to > volunteer but my capacities are I think to limited to help on a > technical level for now (if someone has spare time to teach me I have no > problem with learning). > Reusing software that works especially if they are under GPL is I think > not a problem. > > Users have always the freedom to deactivate them and put something else, > contrarily to the "eme" and other bad software that mozilla integrated. > > µblock origin is really a good extension I personally use it icecat. > We could go further with umatrix but people are too much disturbed by it. > > A functionality that would be interesting is when icecat opens for the > first time, a new window could propose to activate the addons in the > browser with a small explication of what it does. > > Le 23/09/2016 19:51, Ivan Zaigralin a écrit : >> Please do not take this as anything but constructive criticism. I fully >> understand how limited the >> resources are, and I firmly believe that even in the present state icecat & >> most of the bundled >> features are incredibly useful and effective. I am merely trying to point >> out some directions for >> future development, once the resources are plentiful :) >> >> I believe icecat should do something more drastic than simply switch the >> adblocker. Something >> needs to change in the way features are added. It was a technical mistake to >> put core >> functionality into an existing adblocker, just as it is far from ideal to >> bundle https everywhere. >> This practice robs users of their freedom to choose addons, and it breaks >> icecat when it is >> repackaged for inclusion into a distribution (maintainers have to choose >> between locking users >> into a specific addon combination, or stripping addons, with both options >> clearly bad). >> >> One cromulent way to include functionality is by producing own in-house >> addons, like LibreJS, >> which minimize the interference with other addons by narrowing their >> function and keeping a >> separate namespace. >> >> Instead of writing features into an adblocker or httpser, these features >> need to be decoupled, so >> that users are free choose among dozens of functional equivalents, without >> sacrificing the extra >> privacy provided by gnuzilla code. >> >> On Friday, September 23, 2016 09:48:36 Sedov Andrey wrote: >>> Adblock Plus began to distribute advertising (Acceptable Ads Platform >>> <https://AcceptableAds.com/Platform>) = Adblock Plus died. uBlock Origin >>> is the only solution. >>> >>> 23.09.2016 08:56, David Hedlund пишет: >>>> I think it is time to build Spyblock from Adblock Plus (ABP) to uBlock >>>> Origin (uBO). >>>> >>>> Adblock Plus is as usually the most popular add-on on >>>> addons.mozilla.org but have grow less popular over time, while uBlock >>>> Origin is currently the 6th most popular add-on on addons.mozilla.org >>>> and have grow more popular over time. uBlock Origin one of the fastest >>>> trending add-on I've seen. >>>> >>>> uBO has dozens of features that's missing in ABP. For example uBO can >>>> block popunders that ABP cannot. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org >> >> >> >> -- >> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org >> > > > > -- > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
