It's under GPLv3 if there is a problem with it can be forked >an unknown group of people that seem to desperately want those addons >installed on every single browser everywhere
And what the problem ? Maybe because it's actually a better alternative to any other solution. I participate myself to installing the addon on browsers. >the fact that they are pushing those so incredibly hard makes me >instantly reject them forever You aren't making any sense do you read or understand what you right ? "ho my ! the internet is heavily used by people so I wont use it" This is what I interpret from you. >if GNU icecat ever gets ublock or umatrix, I will personally abandon >GNU icecat because I will no longer trust it. It's free software fork it if you are not happy or compile it without the addons. >spyblock is great, does one job, and does it good. no it cannot block some content because adblock plus is designed to be a addlbock and not more that. Listen, if it becomes like adblock plus, someone else will make another free software, just like when adblock edge was a thing, then µblock screwed up and µblock origin who will carry the torch etc... It's an endless cycle. But please in the future make constructed posts this is not a chan board try to not shitpost. Le 04/10/2016 03:17, [email protected] a écrit : > "µblock origin is really a good extension I personally use it icecat. > We could go further with umatrix but people are too much disturbed by it." > > ublock and umatrix as well as other similarly named addons were (and continue > to be) heavily shilled by an unknown group of people that seem to desperately > want those addons installed on every single browser everywhere. the fact that > they are pushing those so incredibly hard makes me instantly reject them > forever. if GNU icecat ever gets ublock or umatrix, I will personally abandon > GNU icecat because I will no longer trust it. spyblock is great, does one > job, and does it good. > > -- > Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today! > https://tutanota.com > > 26. Sep 2016 19:28 by [email protected]: > > >> Icecat is already limited by the number of volunteers, I would like to >> volunteer but my capacities are I think to limited to help on a >> technical level for now (if someone has spare time to teach me I have no >> problem with learning). >> Reusing software that works especially if they are under GPL is I think >> not a problem. >> >> Users have always the freedom to deactivate them and put something else, >> contrarily to the "eme" and other bad software that mozilla integrated. >> >> µblock origin is really a good extension I personally use it icecat. >> We could go further with umatrix but people are too much disturbed by it. >> >> A functionality that would be interesting is when icecat opens for the >> first time, a new window could propose to activate the addons in the >> browser with a small explication of what it does. >> >> Le 23/09/2016 19:51, Ivan Zaigralin a écrit : >>> Please do not take this as anything but constructive criticism. I fully >>> understand how limited the >>> resources are, and I firmly believe that even in the present state icecat & >>> most of the bundled >>> features are incredibly useful and effective. I am merely trying to point >>> out some directions for >>> future development, once the resources are plentiful :) >>> >>> I believe icecat should do something more drastic than simply switch the >>> adblocker. Something >>> needs to change in the way features are added. It was a technical mistake >>> to put core >>> functionality into an existing adblocker, just as it is far from ideal to >>> bundle https everywhere. >>> This practice robs users of their freedom to choose addons, and it breaks >>> icecat when it is >>> repackaged for inclusion into a distribution (maintainers have to choose >>> between locking users >>> into a specific addon combination, or stripping addons, with both options >>> clearly bad). >>> >>> One cromulent way to include functionality is by producing own in-house >>> addons, like LibreJS, >>> which minimize the interference with other addons by narrowing their >>> function and keeping a >>> separate namespace. >>> >>> Instead of writing features into an adblocker or httpser, these features >>> need to be decoupled, so >>> that users are free choose among dozens of functional equivalents, without >>> sacrificing the extra >>> privacy provided by gnuzilla code. >>> >>> On Friday, September 23, 2016 09:48:36 Sedov Andrey wrote: >>>> Adblock Plus began to distribute advertising (Acceptable Ads Platform >>>> <>>> https://AcceptableAds.com/Platform>>> >) = Adblock Plus died. uBlock >>>> Origin >>>> is the only solution. >>>> >>>> 23.09.2016 08:56, David Hedlund пишет: >>>>> I think it is time to build Spyblock from Adblock Plus (ABP) to uBlock >>>>> Origin (uBO). >>>>> >>>>> Adblock Plus is as usually the most popular add-on on >>>>> addons.mozilla.org but have grow less popular over time, while uBlock >>>>> Origin is currently the 6th most popular add-on on addons.mozilla.org >>>>> and have grow more popular over time. uBlock Origin one of the fastest >>>>> trending add-on I've seen. >>>>> >>>>> uBO has dozens of features that's missing in ABP. For example uBO can >>>>> block popunders that ABP cannot. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org >>> >> >> -- >> Note: veuillez s'il vous plaît utiliser GnuPg pour nos futures conversations >> https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/fr >> Plus d'info ici: >> http://www.bibmath.net/crypto/index.php?action=affiche&quoi=moderne/pgp >> >> Message envoyé avec GNU Icedove un fork de Thunderbird >> https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Icedove -- Note: veuillez s'il vous plaît utiliser GnuPg pour nos futures conversations https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/fr/ Plus d'info ici: http://www.bibmath.net/crypto/index.php?action=affiche&quoi=moderne/pgp Message envoyé avec GNU Icedove un fork de Thunderbird https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Icedove
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
