People asking for a new IceCat version for Windows, they already have IceCat 38.8.0 ans it seems usable. Any freedom and security enhancement they ask for, it's to GNU/Linux direction.
El 29/12/16 a les 23:58, Daniel Quintiliani ha escrit: > I think there's been a real problem lately where complaints by users are > being confused with official project decisions. Like when v45.5 and v45.3 > were released Linux only, some of us asked if a Windows version would be > available, and it turned into arguments about whether we should expand > non-DRM browsers under unfree systems. Instead of arguments we need to focus > on the project and official policy vs mailing list opinions. We should also > focus on who the decision makers actually are, to my knowledge Ruben has been > busy lately but someone can easily say "Why should we maintain a Windows or > Mac version of IceCat?" and be confused for someone who is making decisions > for the project. > > -- > > -Dan Q > > On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 09:03:32 -0800, Gary Driggs <gdri...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Daniel Quintiliani wrote: >>> >>> Ruben having discontinued Windows support for IceCat was the best and >>> easiest way to force most of the human population into DRM. >> >> Where did you see any such announcement? >> >> Maybe we should start an alternate mailing list, political-gnuzi...@gnu.org, >> so the rest of us can discuss technical topics in peace. >> -- >> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > > > > -- > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org