are you implying that it's silly to look for problems and then improve by
updating?
I guess we should just stop looking for vulnerabilities to fix, because if we
ignore them they will all just go away right? Wrong.
30. Dec 2016 15:38 by [email protected]:
> IceCat 45 must have vulnerabilities too, and then someone will ask for
> Icecat 52, etc.
>
>
> El 30/12/16 a les 17:44, Daniel Quintiliani ha escrit:
>> Numerous remote code execution vulnerabilities? You're kidding me right?
>>
>> --
>>
>> -Dan Q
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 11:06:10 +0100, Narcis Garcia <>>
>> [email protected]>> > wrote:
>>
>>> People asking for a new IceCat version for Windows, they already have
>>> IceCat 38.8.0 ans it seems usable.
>>> Any freedom and security enhancement they ask for, it's to GNU/Linux
>>> direction.
>>>
>>>
>>> El 29/12/16 a les 23:58, Daniel Quintiliani ha escrit:
>>>> I think there's been a real problem lately where complaints by users are
>>>> being confused with official project decisions. Like when v45.5 and v45.3
>>>> were released Linux only, some of us asked if a Windows version would be
>>>> available, and it turned into arguments about whether we should expand
>>>> non-DRM browsers under unfree systems. Instead of arguments we need to
>>>> focus on the project and official policy vs mailing list opinions. We
>>>> should also focus on who the decision makers actually are, to my knowledge
>>>> Ruben has been busy lately but someone can easily say "Why should we
>>>> maintain a Windows or Mac version of IceCat?" and be confused for someone
>>>> who is making decisions for the project.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> -Dan Q
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 09:03:32 -0800, Gary Driggs <>>>>
>>>> [email protected]>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ruben having discontinued Windows support for IceCat was the best and
>>>>>> easiest way to force most of the human population into DRM.
>>>>>
>>>>> Where did you see any such announcement?
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe we should start an alternate mailing list, >>>>>
>>>>> [email protected]>>>>> , so the rest of us can discuss technical
>>>>> topics in peace.
>>>>> --
>>>>> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
>>
>>
>
> --
> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
