I totally agree, there is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to use a slightly more secure
browser like icecate on ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTINGLY BACKDOORED BOTNET surveillance,
freedom and privacy destroying operating systems like those of apple and
microsoft. why? because there is no benefit. the levels of disrespect that
apple and microsoft have for user privacy (remember, they are a part of the nsa
spying cult known as PRISM) are so high that there is no doubt in my opinion
that any possible benefit to using icecat is instantly reduced to nothing while
using it on windows or mac.
Using icecat on windows or mac is like bringing a bucket of fresh water with
you everywhere you go because it has the salt removed and is more secure
against salt, and then going to the middle of the ocean and expecting your
freshwater to not get salty. I honestly believe that everyone who suggests more
hard work for those involved with icecat to make it function on windows or mac
are some kind of weirdos with hidden intentions.
14. Mar 2017 02:13 by m...@netris.org:
> "Daniel Quintiliani" <> d...@runbox.com> > writes:
>> Please reconsider your discontinuation of Windows and Mac versions, as
>> libre browsing is most needed in DRM-based OSes, not Linux :(
>
> Please, let's not propose adding more work for Rubén. Given that he's
> already too overloaded to produce IceCat releases in a timely fashion,
> and given the paramount importance of reducing the latency of IceCat
> security updates, I fully support his decision to reduce the amount of
> work associated with each release. Let someone else volunteer to build
> binaries for Windows and Mac, if there's sufficient interest.
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> --
> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
