No. But the difference between icecat and firefox on window$ is the difference between good rubber boots and leaky rubber boots, while crossing the ocean.
On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 22:23:01 Daniel Quintiliani wrote: > So you would recommend most of the planet use Microsoft Edge then? > > -- > > -Dan Q > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:58:25 +0100 (CET), <[email protected]> wrote: > > I totally agree, there is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to use a slightly more > > secure browser like icecate on ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTINGLY BACKDOORED BOTNET > > surveillance, freedom and privacy destroying operating systems like those > > of apple and microsoft. why? because there is no benefit. the levels of > > disrespect that apple and microsoft have for user privacy (remember, they > > are a part of the nsa spying cult known as PRISM) are so high that there > > is no doubt in my opinion that any possible benefit to using icecat is > > instantly reduced to nothing while using it on windows or mac. > > > > Using icecat on windows or mac is like bringing a bucket of fresh water > > with you everywhere you go because it has the salt removed and is more > > secure against salt, and then going to the middle of the ocean and > > expecting your freshwater to not get salty. I honestly believe that > > everyone who suggests more hard work for those involved with icecat to > > make it function on windows or mac are some kind of weirdos with hidden > > intentions.> > > 14. Mar 2017 02:13 by [email protected]: > > > "Daniel Quintiliani" <> [email protected]> > writes: > > >> Please reconsider your discontinuation of Windows and Mac versions, as > > >> libre browsing is most needed in DRM-based OSes, not Linux :( > > > > > > Please, let's not propose adding more work for Rubén. Given that he's > > > already too overloaded to produce IceCat releases in a timely fashion, > > > and given the paramount importance of reducing the latency of IceCat > > > security updates, I fully support his decision to reduce the amount of > > > work associated with each release. Let someone else volunteer to build > > > binaries for Windows and Mac, if there's sufficient interest. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > -- > > > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > > -- > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
