And I am getting more and more satisfied with icecat. I have critiqued the release schedule in the past, but I came to understand that developers need to strike a balance between upstream updates and downstream fixes, which are often just as important. And since I don't understand any of the technical issues facing them, I could as well shut up.
> The GNU project is about providing freedom to > people who need it, not *deliberately* harming people's lives with insecure > software just because they use closed-source OSes. Lacking resources is what is happening, and you just called it "*deliberately* harming people's lives". Please consider contributing a binary window$ build or a build instruction manual, I am sure the project will accept them. I do believe icecat would be better than firefox on any os, and I suspect developers would agree. But I would also argue that the edge gained with icecat on window$ simply does not warrant an effort to provide it. I am afraid that it could also create a false sense of privacy, while no such thing exists in the window$ world. Not worth developing, don't you agree, Daniel? It sounds like you, for one, have absolutely no time to contribute, so may be that's all that's happening. With more resources, I am sure it would still be provided.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
