don't be silly.

15. Mar 2017 22:23 by d...@runbox.com:


> So you would recommend most of the planet use Microsoft Edge then?
>
> --
>
> -Dan Q
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:58:25 +0100 (CET), <> awake...@tutanota.de> > wrote:
>
>> I totally agree, there is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to use a slightly more secure 
>> browser like icecate on ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTINGLY BACKDOORED BOTNET 
>> surveillance, freedom and privacy destroying operating systems like those of 
>> apple and microsoft. why? because there is no benefit. the levels of 
>> disrespect that apple and microsoft have for user privacy (remember, they 
>> are a part of the nsa spying cult known as PRISM) are so high that there is 
>> no doubt in my opinion that any possible benefit to using icecat is 
>> instantly reduced to nothing while using it on windows or mac.
>>
>> Using icecat on windows or mac is like bringing a bucket of fresh water with 
>> you everywhere you go because it has the salt removed and is more secure 
>> against salt, and then going to the middle of the ocean and expecting your 
>> freshwater to not get salty. I honestly believe that everyone who suggests 
>> more hard work for those involved with icecat to make it function on windows 
>> or mac are some kind of weirdos with hidden intentions.
>>
>> 14. Mar 2017 02:13 by >> m...@netris.org>> :
>>
>>
>> > "Daniel Quintiliani" <> >> d...@runbox.com>> > > writes:
>> >> Please reconsider your discontinuation of Windows and Mac versions, as
>> >> libre browsing is most needed in DRM-based OSes, not Linux :(
>> >
>> > Please, let's not propose adding more work for Rubén.  Given that he's
>> > already too overloaded to produce IceCat releases in a timely fashion,
>> > and given the paramount importance of reducing the latency of IceCat
>> > security updates, I fully support his decision to reduce the amount of
>> > work associated with each release.  Let someone else volunteer to build
>> > binaries for Windows and Mac, if there's sufficient interest.
>> >
>> >      Regards,
>> >        Mark
>> >
>> > --
>> > >> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org

Reply via email to