> Now I'm really confused. My intention IS to get a zero vertical
> spacing.
You don't get one with groff 1.18 -- \n[.V] for devps output is *very*
small (1/72000 inch). Anyway, it increases the vertical position
counter which probably triggers some trap (I haven't checked the code)
...
> The problem is that this does not work is used inside macro call
> that is placed inside a 'tbl' body, in V19.
... which wouldn't be triggered if there is really no vertical
movement.
> I read in the notes that '.vs 0' should have generated warning, and
> use the previous default. [...]
You haven't tried hard enough:
groff -ww mini.t > mini.ps
gives
mini.t: warning: vertical spacing must be greater than 0
...
> I hope that you can run the example that I attached (in my original
> email) in v18 and v19 - if not - I will be happy to provide you with
> output (is Postscript OK ?) - and see the difference.
I've tested your file, and I can confirm your problem. Doing the
replacement suggested in my first answer fixes it, giving identical
results with both 1.18 and 1.19.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Bug-groff mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-groff
