Follow-up Comment #5, bug #60571 (project groff): [comment #4 comment #4:] > Yeah, I just don't know where the forum for modern *roff > standardization is. Is it groff at gnu?
http://github.com/n-t-roff/heirloom-doctools does direct users there for discussion, but I'm not sure how much developer representation there is on the list. I'm also not aware of any better forum, though. > _within_ a project, like groff, I think it behooves us to have > consistent semantics for them. Absolutely. But when letters are running short, and none of the handful remaining seems to fit the new use you have in mind, you might have to be less stringent than you'd like. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60571> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
