Update of bug #61025 (project groff):
Status: Fixed => In Progress
Open/Closed: Closed => Open
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #6:
Reopening. Discussions with Dave Kemper have underscored to me
the importance of honoring the me(7) package's naming
convention.
This means that, unless I want to expose a macro to manipulate
the `$x` register (and I don't), I should rename it to
advertise itself as user-fiddlable per the introduction of the
"me Reference Manual".
`ss`, which one can read as 'super/subscript space', is
available in the name space and seems pretty mnemonic.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61025>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
