Update of bug #61025 (project groff):
Status: Fixed => In Progress
Open/Closed: Closed => Open
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #9:
We're still not quite there yet.
See <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-groff/2022-01/msg00010.html>
and
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-groff/2022-01/msg00011.html>.
The `_*` string can go, as can the resets of `*` in the `+c` and `)f`
macros; since the interpolation of the `$f` register is already guarded
by a backslash layer, the footnote number won't be interpolated too
early.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61025>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
