Follow-up Comment #2, bug #64183 (group groff): Hi Dave,
[comment #1 comment #1:] > Of the two patches attached here, the contrib/pdfmark/sanitize.tmac patch > is now obsolete, as that directory was removed from the groff tree (per > bug #63827) in November. I believe that to be the case. As I noted originally, I've already made the change upstream, in groff-pdfmark, (which is now [https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/groff-pdfmark/ hosted on Savannah], and not on OSDN, which appears to be defunct). > It appears to me that the test-groff patch is merely to facilitate running > your example; it doesn't seem to be a modification you are proposing for > groff. Is my reading correct? Well, it does allow any command, other than groff itself, to be run in the test-groff environment, (e.g. CMD=pdfroff test-groff ...). It was necessary to let me run my example, but is by no means specific to it; thus it may have more general utility. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64183> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
