Update of bug #64183 (group groff):
Status: Need Info => None
Summary: [PATCH] [pdfroff] sanitize.tmac throws warning when
-ww specified => [PATCH] allow test-groff to run a command besides
"groff"
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #3:
[comment #2 comment #2:]
> Well, it does allow any command, other than groff itself, to be run
> in the test-groff environment, (e.g. CMD=pdfroff test-groff ...).
> It was necessary to let me run my example, but is by no means
> specific to it; thus it may have more general utility.
Makes sense.
I suspect, based on discussion in bug #55941 and bug #57630, that groff
developers would consider this modification unwarranted mission creep for
test-groff. On the other hand, it might be the general nroff testing solution
Branden was pining for in comment 4 of the former of those two tickets. So
I'm leaving this open for someone more official to make that call.
I retitled the bug to reflect the now-reduced scope.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64183>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
