Follow-up Comment #5, bug #67693 (group groff): Hi Dave,
At 2025-11-22T17:30:44-0500, Dave wrote:
> Follow-up Comment #4, bug #67693 (group groff):
>
> [comment #3 comment #3:]
>> I also don't want _groff_ documentation to pretend that some
>> typographers really do speak in the former manner.
>
> Is this a disagreement with the thread cited in comment #1? Or is
> there a missing negative in that sentence?
The latter. Argh.
I meant to say:
>> I also don't want _groff_ documentation to pretend that some
>> typographers don't speak in the former manner.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?67693>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
