Follow-up Comment #12, bug #68511 (group groff): [comment #5 comment #5:] > [comment #2 comment #2:] >> There's not really a good workaround to this. > > I don't think this was a deliberate change.
I was pretty sure it wasn't. The workarounds I provided here and in bug
#68510 were so that that info could be taken into account when prioritizing
work, in case they turned out to be thorny problems. Since #68510 had a
fairly simple workaround, and this one didn't, that suggests (all else being
equal, which it never is) prioritizing this bug higher.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68511>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
