Follow-up Comment #15, bug #68511 (group groff): My previous comment was exquisitely ill-written.
Let me try those first 2 paragraphs again.
At 2026-07-11T22:01:05-0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Both were conceptually simple, and both arose from regressions arising
> from refactorings I did on the same day.
>
> Again, conceptually, the problem is that we've been muddling around
> without a proper grammar for the groff language. Several requests,
> like `cflags`, `hcode`, and `rchar`, can take "groff characters"
> (ordinary, special, indexed) as "arguments", but unlike other
> "arguments" in *roff, spaces need not separate them.
That might be more comprehensible. Fingers crossed.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68511>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
