Follow-up Comment #10, bug #68525 (group groff): At 2026-07-16T21:33:21-0400, Dave wrote: > Follow-up Comment #9, bug #68525 (group groff): > > [comment #7 comment #7:] >> ...or it requires _both_. > > True, also a possibility. > >> It looks like the `PSPIC` macro wants the EPS file...even if >> it ends up not using it? > > Should that warrant a ticket against PSPIC? I don't know enough of > the specifics to have an opinion, but in general, failing when you > can't find a file you don't need should be frowned upon.
I don't know enough of the specifics either. I looked over it to see if
it guarded all the EPS processing inside a conditional that excluded the
'html' output device, and it doesn't. I looked into whether it _could_,
and tenatively concluded "no" because the bounding box extraction stuff
is tangled up with the specialized "suppression" feature that is coupled
to pre-grohtml(1).
I don't know that there's a ticket to be filed. I have a long-term
ambition to kill off pre-grohtml entirely.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68525>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
