Follow-up Comment #6, bug #68733 (group groff): At 2026-10-04T17:33:20-0400, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Follow-up Comment #5, bug #68733 (group groff): > looks reasonable to code inspection and appears to works in casual > testing (without installation):
Cool.
> $ ./mmroff /root/xxx
> mmroff: fatal error: "groff -rRef=1 -z -mm /root/xxx" exited with status 1024
>
>
> Needless to say, the meaning of the very helpful message "exited with
> status 1024" will be obvious to any user familiar with the *status
> argument of the wait(2) system call and with the WEXITSTATUS() macro
> defined in <sys/wait.h>: groff(1) called exit(1), did not die from a
> signal, and produced no core(5) dump. Clear, obvious, and simple -
> right? =8-D
I noticed that too. We could copy over the `abort(autopsy($?))` stuff
from _pdfmom_(1)...
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68733>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
