Your message dated 27 Jun 2000 10:27:29 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 0.5.94
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Apr 1999 14:52:24 +0000
Received: (qmail 29706 invoked from network); 10 Apr 1999 14:52:24 -0000
Received: from blastula.phys.columbia.edu (128.59.132.160)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 1999 14:52:24 -0000
Received: from localhost (zack@localhost)
by blastula.phys.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/2) with ESMTP id KAA27388
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 10:52:24 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: grub: should have way to install modified stage1.5 -and- stage2
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 10:52:23 -0400
From: Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: grub
Version: 0.5.91
Severity: wishlist
In complicated multiple-boot configurations, it would be nice to have
the ability to rewrite the hardcoded configuration of both stage1.5
and stage2 at installation time. For example: I have several
operating systems coexisting on a large disk. I place all their
kernels, stage2, and menu.lst on a separate partition at the beginning
of the disk, to avoid problems with BIOS disk-access limits. I want
to put stage1 in the MBR and stage1.5 in the unused area of cylinder
0. stage1.5 should look for (hd0,1)/stage2 and stage2 should look for
(hd0,1)/menu.lst. Setting this up involves modifying all three
stages' hardcoded configuration, which cannot be done with an install=
command.
stage2 fits in the unused area of cylinder 0, so you can just do it
that way, but then you lose the advantages of having a stage1.5.
zw
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 35852-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2000 16:31:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 27 11:31:45 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from static204-83-206-163.reverse.accesscomm.ca (trick.fig.org)
[204.83.206.163]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 136yH2-0002cD-00; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:31:44 -0500
Received: from ppp24-72-50-138.reverse.accesscomm.ca (faust.fig.org) [24.72.50.138]
by trick.fig.org with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 136yGz-00042L-00; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:31:43 -0600
Received: from gord by faust.fig.org with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 136yCv-0003zK-00; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:27:29 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in 0.5.94
X-Attribution: Gord
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 27 Jun 2000 10:27:29 -0600
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 4
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> //\ I'm a FIG (http://fig.org/)
Committed to freedom and diversity \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)
