--- Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe this is not true currently. For NetBSD 1.6.1 GRUB was able to > boot via:
Really!? I didn't know. IIRC, 1.5.x couldn't be booted. Someone added support for backward compatibility? Maybe I should take a look at the archives of NetBSD mailing lists... > Okuji, is UFS2 ok to go for 0.9x? Note that FreeBSD 5.1 or newer default > installs are not supported without it. The principle is that you should add a new feature only if the feature is critical. So if you think support for UFS2 is essential, I don't object. But, please don't modify fsys_ffs.c. Instead, create a new file fsys_ufs2.c or something. I don't want to break support for FFS, because it is used not only by *BSD. Okuji _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
