On Tuesday 14 October 2003 22:51, Thierry Laronde wrote: > I don't think this should be a problem since GRUB in its present state > is hardly maintainable. The problem has been and is that when I started > to work on stage1 I tried to keep in mind future since I didn't want to > make the work twice. Working with the core of GRUB showed me that it > will be better, for future versions, to simply restart almost from > scratch but with the experience gained. But stage1 is... the beginning, > so I introduced some features that are not, now, used, but could be > later. That's perhaps the things you found mysterious.
*sigh* Thierry, I explained why I thought your code was not good to you again and again. Did you forget all of them? I don't want to repeat the same things from the beginning. Anyway, you are not the one who judges what is maintainable, because you decided not to maintain your code. I am the one who does that, and I know the current code is maintainable somehow. Okuji _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
