Andreas Enge <[email protected]> skribis: > Am Freitag, 21. Dezember 2012 schrieb Nikita Karetnikov: >> 1. Change 'uri' according to this [1] example. > > What does this change? Especially as it is not done systematically > for the files already in the distribution.
Yeah, this is a minor issue, just a formatting convention that we should try to follow. >> 3. It's probably better to say what licenses are used for the other >> files. > > Actually, what is one expected to do concerning licenses? > README says: > "Rsync may be used, modified and redistributed only under the terms of > the GNU General Public License, found in the file COPYING in this > distribution" > > COPYING is GPLv3. So I checked a few files whether this means > gpl3 or gpl3+. > > rsync.c states gpl3+, for example. > > Some other files have different license statements. There is a subdirectory > popt containing a different COPYING (looks like X11 license). The combined work is GPLv3+ anyway, so I guess you were right in choosing gpl3+ as the license. Thanks! Ludo’.
