> I’ve pushed the paper under the new guix/maintenance.git repository > [0].
I've spotted some typos. > (p [This section describe the functional package management > paradigm and its implementation in Nix. It then shows how Guix differs, > and what the rationale is.]) The word "describe" should be changed to "describes." > (p [Our goals when designing Guix was to provide interfaces > ranging from Nix's low-level primitives such as ,(tt > [derivation]) to high-level package declarations. "Our goal" instead of "our goals." > Input file names are similarly reified through the ,(tt [%build-inputs]) > variable (not shown here.) Change to "variable (not shown here)." > As an additional constraint, this extra layer should be efficient in > space and time: package management tools need to be able to load and > traverse a distribution consisting in thousands of packages.]) Replace "consisting in" with "consisting of."
pgpNjWkYDoq17.pgp
Description: PGP signature
