Nikita Karetnikov <[email protected]> skribis: >> I’ve put the paper under the GFDL. (I’m not completely sure it’s the >> best choice for a paper though, because it exposes factual data about >> related work and a statements of a personal vision whose alteration >> could lead to a completely different work.) > > I think it's OK. Take a look at the "When should a section be > invariant?" [1] paragraph.
Yes, I know, but I would find it hard to select what to make invariant (bits of the intro and conclusion? related work?), not to mention that this could prevent legitimate reuse. > Also, one must "preserve the section Entitled 'History'" or "create one > stating the title, year, authors, and publisher of the Document as given > on its Title Page, then add an item describing the Modified Version as > stated in the previous sentence." [2] Right, I had overlooked all that. Well, I guess I’m happy with the current situation then. Ludo’.
