On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 06:23:07PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:52:41 +0100
> Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> wrote:
> > I think it would work better if when installing python@3, a ‘python’
> > executable would be available in the PATH.  Maybe there is a technical
> > reason for not doing so, but I find its absence rather confusing.
> For backward compatibility, the 'python' executable always has to be Python 2.
> A lot of old scripts specify just "/usr/bin/env python" in the shebang.
> On the other hand if your script supports Python 3 you know it.

We do also have the 'python-wrapper' package which uses python3 as

Efraim Flashner   <efr...@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to