Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 06:23:07PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
>> Hi Mathieu,
>> On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:52:41 +0100
>> Mathieu Lirzin <m...@gnu.org> wrote:
>> > I think it would work better if when installing python@3, a ‘python’
>> > executable would be available in the PATH. Maybe there is a technical
>> > reason for not doing so, but I find its absence rather confusing.
>> For backward compatibility, the 'python' executable always has to be Python
>> A lot of old scripts specify just "/usr/bin/env python" in the shebang.
>> On the other hand if your script supports Python 3 you know it.
> We do also have the 'python-wrapper' package which uses python3 as
Closing because it’s not a bug.
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC