Hi Tim, Thanks for your feedback.
Tim Gesthuizen <[email protected]> skribis: > I noticed that someone packaged emacs-clang-format. > There are some problems with the current package definition: > > - clang already distributes the same functionality (Maybe I am missing a > feature that clangs version does not have though). > - The package also includes integration for clang-rename. > - The package should probably have a more generic name and function as a > package for all emacs integration clang offers. > - The clang package is installing the same files under share/clang. > Maybe those should be removed. > - The license is incorrect. The version that is cloned from github > also seems to have some licensing issues (Missing full license...) > > You'll find an example package definition attached. > This can probably be optimized a little bit more so that the full clang > tarball does not need to be extracted twice. Pierre, WDYT? Thanks in advance! :-) Ludo’.
