On 14.11.2018 11:48, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: >> : - The license is incorrect. The version that is cloned from github >> : also seems to have some licensing issues (Missing full license...) > > Which license? >
The emacs-clang-format package definition claims that the package is licensed under the GPLv3+. The files in the repository are licensed under the same license that clang is licensed under ( The headers of the files actually say that they are from the LLVM project). This means the package is licensed under University of Illinois/NCSA Open Source License. So while it would probably be legal to distribute binaries and source code under the terms of the GPL this should probably be fixed :) Tim.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
